Robert Kraft Prosecutors Give Bold Admission On Spa Video Evidence

Patriots owner Robert Kraft doesn’t really focus on what prosecutors say regarding the video evidence Jupiter police officers recorded inside the Orchids of Asia Day Spa. This video may not see the light of the day.

The Patriots owner has filed a request to prosecutor to hand over the evidence regarding the “number of individuals who were recorded on video in the massage rooms while receiving lawful massages or were not charged.” 

The question is next: How many innocent individuals were videotaped during the 5-day process inside the rooms?

In these documents, prosecutors say that police officers recorded two men and two women on January 20 and 21 who received “lawful massages.”

So, one of the men who were recorded in the day spa decided to sue prosecutors and Jupiter PD. Let’s not forget that he wasn’t engaged in any sexual activity in the day spa. The man says his civil rights had been violated. His lawyer, Joe Tacopina, revealed that the man isn’t the only person to be recorded. Tacopina revealed that he had spoken to 17 people who used the services in the spa.

Kraft’s lawyers believe that prosecutors are now lowballing the number of individuals recorded getting legit massage. They are now asking the state to reveal the number of people who were recorded in the process.

Kraft says the police didn’t have any right to record inside the day spa. Recording innocent people isn’t right, and this may block the release of the video.

“Prosecutors just admitted at a hearing about the Robert Kraft video they will not charge anyone at Orchids of Asia with human trafficking. Prosecutor: ‘we have no evidence that there’s human trafficking involved.’

“To be clear: the prosecutors said they investigated claims of human trafficking because there was initially a basis for it, which necessitated the installation of the video cameras and other evidence gathering methods,” Michele Steele reported.

Kraft’s legal team has checked the video. Bill Burck said, “It’s basically pornography. I don’t think there’s interest the state has, or the media has, in publishing it…there’s no need to actually see the video.”

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *